A very deeply deeply flawed man
Hover over the thumbnail for a full-size version.
| Author | formica |
|---|---|
| Tags | author:formica playable rated survival |
| Created | 2005-11-19 |
| Rating |
4 by 16 people.
|
| Map Data | |
| Description | My first survival in yonks. |
Other maps by this author
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Artsy | Sunken | The Epic- Part XV- Civilisation | BAARS!11!1!1!111!11!ONEONEONEONEONE | The Uber- Cave | Super Bubbly Happy Fun Time |
Comments
Pages: (0)
2006-04-25
Nice...not my favorite
one of my first trys
4/5
4/5
| Demo Data |
|---|
2005-12-20
Eepness...
Survivals are evil, but I liked this one... My demo isn't worth posting... 100-something slides =(, anyway, the title reminds me of something Through SomethingAwful.com it was quite a funny flash movies which I can't remember the name of...
2005-12-02
Nice map BTW
I like the tileset too.
| Demo Data |
|---|
2005-12-02
dongolov cheated!
this demo clearly lasts longer yet his demo has 400 more frames!
| Demo Data |
|---|
2005-11-19
I was
going to point out several grammatical errors and inconsistencies in blue_tetris's posts, but decided that I'd like to live another day.
Nice map. :D. 4.5.
Nice map. :D. 4.5.
2005-11-19
You'll notice in the second line of my last post that there seems to be an error in verb tense.
Disregard it and any other errors encountered in the message.
This map roXXorz.
4.5.
This map roXXorz.
4.5.
2005-11-19
Disregard the last post.
I made a typing error in the beginning. The name of the map is actually "A very deeply deeply flawed man" and I named it incorrectly in the first instance, perhaps because the word map was on my mind.
Anyway, by the end of the message I had realized my flaw but could not corrected after I hit the send button.
Anyway, to make a long story short, I'd like you all to simply disregard that last post.
I gave the map a 4.5 out of 5. It's everything that a Survival map should be.
Again, 4.5 out of 5.
Everything a survival map should be.
So... 4.5.
Anyway, by the end of the message I had realized my flaw but could not corrected after I hit the send button.
Anyway, to make a long story short, I'd like you all to simply disregard that last post.
I gave the map a 4.5 out of 5. It's everything that a Survival map should be.
Again, 4.5 out of 5.
Everything a survival map should be.
So... 4.5.
2005-11-19
Neat map.
I question the syntax. A very deeply deeply flawed map (vs.) A very very deeply flawed man.
Nonetheless, great map.
I'm only nitpicking. Which is to say, I'm scrutinizing too closely about an aspect of the map that doesn't really matter.
I mean, it's an excellent map. My nitpicking should just be disregarded. Because all it does is waste time discussing minutiae that really have no bearing on the goodness of the map.
And it's a good map, so I wouldn't want to ramble on and on about grammatical rules. But that's just my thing. It felt like the right thing to do. And I apologize for it now, because it appears to have just wasted everyone's time.
I guess what I'm trying to say, to make a long story short, is excellent map.
The name is a bit...
Well, I won't go back into that, because it might sound like I'm rambling.
This is EXACTLY what a survival map needs to be and, as a fan of survival maps, I couldn't feel right with myself if I gave it less than a 4.5.
So I'm giving it a 4.5.
I think 4.5 sounds like the best thing to give it.
I find it to be a very awesome map with a decent name.
Hell, now that I look at it, the name kinda works in a satirical sort of way. It grabs at the dadaism of the map's style, so it should be considered a benefitial aspect of the map.
I feel bad for criticising it now.
Anyway, 4.5 out of 5.
Excellent job on the map...
...AND the title.
Nonetheless, great map.
I'm only nitpicking. Which is to say, I'm scrutinizing too closely about an aspect of the map that doesn't really matter.
I mean, it's an excellent map. My nitpicking should just be disregarded. Because all it does is waste time discussing minutiae that really have no bearing on the goodness of the map.
And it's a good map, so I wouldn't want to ramble on and on about grammatical rules. But that's just my thing. It felt like the right thing to do. And I apologize for it now, because it appears to have just wasted everyone's time.
I guess what I'm trying to say, to make a long story short, is excellent map.
The name is a bit...
Well, I won't go back into that, because it might sound like I'm rambling.
This is EXACTLY what a survival map needs to be and, as a fan of survival maps, I couldn't feel right with myself if I gave it less than a 4.5.
So I'm giving it a 4.5.
I think 4.5 sounds like the best thing to give it.
I find it to be a very awesome map with a decent name.
Hell, now that I look at it, the name kinda works in a satirical sort of way. It grabs at the dadaism of the map's style, so it should be considered a benefitial aspect of the map.
I feel bad for criticising it now.
Anyway, 4.5 out of 5.
Excellent job on the map...
...AND the title.
2005-11-19
grr
doghouse do you have any idea how much ANY of formica's maps could completely p'wn all of yours put together!!?
stop being a wang...
stop being a wang...
2005-11-19
...
very dissapointing. Seems like another run off the mill map from you today
| Demo Data |
|---|
2005-11-19
okay
wasnt as good as it could have been. i think with the chaingun drones there was a lot less skill involved in staying alive. still fun though :)
| Demo Data |
|---|
squirrel1434
Cool demo