Woods
Hover over the thumbnail for a full-size version.
| Author | Gods_Reaper |
|---|---|
| Tags | action author:gods_reaper fun rated |
| Created | 2009-01-25 |
| Last Modified | 2009-01-25 |
| Rating |
4 by 8 people.
|
| Map Data | |
| Description | these type of tile are fun and im proud of this map.
RCE |
Other maps by this author
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Persistant Lil Man | The Cleaner | CUBErt | Forest | Constitutional Anarchy | Sombody told me |
Comments
Pages: (0)
2009-01-26
i didnt cut and paiste
and i had no idea people made trees like this.
i never try to plagiarize maps. i put my own little thing in everyone of them.
i never try to plagiarize maps. i put my own little thing in everyone of them.
2009-01-26
To answer maxson.
a) wasn't here at the time of those older glories
This is no excuse to cut and paste designs. The best mappers will always find their own way to make their stamp.
b) executes it just as well, if not better, than those older glories
Originality and fresh design is a factor that should always be considered when voting for a map. Therefore points should be lost if cut and pasting elements is so prominent.
This is no excuse to cut and paste designs. The best mappers will always find their own way to make their stamp.
b) executes it just as well, if not better, than those older glories
Originality and fresh design is a factor that should always be considered when voting for a map. Therefore points should be lost if cut and pasting elements is so prominent.
2009-01-25
agree with a lot of the comments
especially from atob
the looks are killer tho, and the game play isn't too bad i like it 4
the looks are killer tho, and the game play isn't too bad i like it 4
2009-01-25
You email it to numa@notdot.net
2009-01-25
Responding to your comment on my map:
Before New Year's, there was an announcement saying that people who wanted to be reviewers could send in applications, which were two sample reviews. PALEMOON, numa_ninja, and I were accepted out of that bunch. I think you can still send in applications that will be reserved for the next time roster changes are made.
2009-01-25
Maybe nostalgic is the wrong word...
I guess what I'm trying to say is, I've only been here for less than three months, and it's hardly fair if someone like me (not necessarily me) makes a good map, that it's not considered as good just because it was done before a year ago.
2009-01-25
But what if that person
a) wasn't here at the time of those older glories and
b) executes it just as well, if not better, than those older glories?
Now, I'm not saying that's the case here (no offense G_R), which is why I gave this a 3, but imo, if it's done very well, it's more nostalgic than anything.
b) executes it just as well, if not better, than those older glories?
Now, I'm not saying that's the case here (no offense G_R), which is why I gave this a 3, but imo, if it's done very well, it's more nostalgic than anything.
2009-01-25
Of course it's fair.
It's just the same as using any generic style or theme prominently in a map.
A well built yet generic map doesn't have all the ingredients necessary for a higher tier score. That more people don't vote/feedback this way is part of the reason 90% of what's on NUMA these days are simply shoddy re-hashes of former glories ;_;
A well built yet generic map doesn't have all the ingredients necessary for a higher tier score. That more people don't vote/feedback this way is part of the reason 90% of what's on NUMA these days are simply shoddy re-hashes of former glories ;_;
2009-01-25
Lol :P
that was my point though: it's kinda unfair to take off points from a rating for unoriginal trees, because there's so few that work well.
Anyway, about the map: it's decent. It's definitely better than the last one (because it's easier to move around in), but something felt lacking here imo. Maybe it was too relaxed, idk. 3.5
Anyway, about the map: it's decent. It's definitely better than the last one (because it's easier to move around in), but something felt lacking here imo. Maybe it was too relaxed, idk. 3.5
2009-01-25
I know of
4 or 5 variations that look and play nicely. This is obviously my favourite type though :p
2009-01-25
It's ok.
The look of the level is just as important as the gameplay, imo. A decent level of imagination is needed in both areas for a good+ map, imo.
2009-01-25
I kinda have to agree with atob
It's actually better without the slope. On the other hand, atob, how many possible trees can be made with N tiles that actually look decent?
2009-01-25
atob
just play this. i think its alot of fun.
2009-01-25
well
i like it. so yea. =D
2009-01-25
All you did
was take the most common tree theme on NUMA and add a slope where the trunk would be. It's boring.
2009-01-25
demo. i died right next to door
.
| Demo Data |
|---|
2009-01-25
i thought i did
... i made one just like this yesterday then some one else did the same trees
2009-01-25
Make
your own trees.
2009-01-25
Am i lost?
am i?
al__cair__raheakallan
5aved...