NUMA

Comments on "Benno ('67)"

Pages: (3) [ 1 ] [ 2 ] 3

...

@karmap0lice: You need to relax if you thought I was serious.
I can't be bothered finding out where it stands
Demo Data

Honestly whether

or not I pissed people off with my comment I liked it, because rarely do people speak their minds and when you make a contreversial statement it gives those mappers reason to speak out. I see where some are coming from but think about it. How do you get out there unless you either know someone or by chance "get noticed." I mean your name doesn't always get out there through forums and shit. Sometimes "the big boys' have to reach out to the little ones. So what Destiny said seems ignorant to me. You should focus on the map with maybe a glance at the author. That's what I do, and I play every map whether shitty or not. (or as many as I can) But ignoring maps because its not a buddy or a major famous mapper ruins the chances of a good beginner of a mapper to become great and help this website grow. So by skipping these maps your inevitably limiting the growth of all mappers. I hope this reveals some flaws and hopefully fixes them, because I want this site to be as amazing as it can and many are preventing that. So yea, rant over.
Man some guys need to take a chill-pill.

Maxson <3
And guys, is it really that hard to just say "I didn't like it" instead of "it shouldn't have been featured"? :/
is that I've commented on this on previous maps in a much more modest way and it gets totally overlooked :/ I'm fine with most negative behaviors by people but someone saying "this is so-and-so" and stating it like it's fact and they're the source of all knowledge is one of my biggest pet peeves :x

Thank you maxson.

I fail to put a lot of things in words like that and your comment is appreciated, if a tad harsh. >_>
allow me to state the rest of my comment in all caps to try and get your attention:

QUALITY IS SUBJECTIVE. ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THERE ARE MANY REVIEWERS IS BECAUSE IT ALLOWS FOR BIAS. JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE DOESN'T LIKE A MAP DOESN'T MEAN IT'S BAD. THE SAYING "NOT FEATURE-WORTHY" DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST BECAUSE IT IS FEATURE-WORTHY IF A REVIEWER FEATURES IT.

GODDAMMIT I'M SORRY FOR EXPLODING AT YOU LIKE THIS BUT I'M SO GODDAMN SICK OF SEEING PEOPLE COMMENT AND SAYING SHIT LIKE THIS. IT'S STUPID AND BASICALLY IS A "FUCK YOU" TO THE REVIEWER.

Stupid

Not a bad map, but definitely not feature-worthy.

What radium said

you guys make sarcasm so hard to understand.

AGD

Not the fastest, but im just happy i completed a map... hehe
Demo Data

now

is that a joke or are you just being an ass?

you meant it in general by saying 'the people want'
I guess i'm a part of that, even though i've never really thought of it that way until now. I guess i click on a map by riobe even when it looks bad, but dont click on maps by authors i havent really heard of unless the thumbnail attracts me to do so.

Well

The map wasnt spectacular and neither was the review, really. Although something of the simplicity of this map did appeal to me.
Demo Data
I want players to slowly savor my map's subtle pleasures, not rush through it like the latest RadiumFalcon sensory assault.
A feature should focus on the map ahead of the author
Anyways a map archive is about maps and not authors, this thing about fame (on a website even) is a bit overrated.
Think the map was too easy and short and a bit bland, and I guess the glamour is a bit hidden because I'm not that interested in speeds :) Gz on the feature :p
Also I can't relate to the title ;)

I never said we.

O_o

I don't know where you got we from techno.
Farman, I beat your agd by a frame :)
Demo Data

gloomp is right.

Especially with #1. If people haven't heard the author but the map is good, I'll skip it. It's obviously the author the people want, not the map.

fireburnsfree

I judge a map on the answers to three questions, yes in all cases being ideal:

1) Is the author famous?
2) Does it have a good description?
3) Is the title referencing something I like?
the rest was pretty lame.

the only thing i like about the map is the gold.
Demo Data

I'm just happy.

That my runs are good.
Is to go for a highscore. Check Nreality.
But that's just me.

This map is bleah.

I don't think it deserved it's feature, imo.
if you took out the bounceblocks

errrrhh

i am NOT a fan.

First try AGD.

As Bill Murray would say: "Get out of here man! I mean it!"
Demo Data

Beat

ZTHING
AGD
Demo Data

Slow First-try AGD

Simple map. Nice feature. I like it. 4/5
Demo Data

Sorry I apologise

I over-reacted but this map was not that great sorry.
The moment atob quits mapping, I'm gone.
I appreciate that you're sticking up for me, Farman. >_>
I usually don't even look at the author when I play maps. I can repeat myself but it would be a lot easier if you just look down a few comments. ._.

As it is.

More well known authors make better maps, which is why they are well known. Leaff wants to feature this, he can. He can feature whatever he wants, even the worst map on NUMA. Don't tell people what to review, when it's entirely up to the reviewer.

Pff.

You don't have a say in it. This happens on every featured map. It's up to the reviewer. End of.

Dude there

are pleanty of deserving mappers that are not as well known that I feel should get it. I just think someone is a tad biased.