NUMA

Comments on "So, uh, guys..."

Pages: (3) [ 1 ] 2 3

Oh

squibbles, I thought you chose him because he started out terrible and then got better. Nevermind about the example then :p

nah, not really. :/

You have a right, yes. Justified, not at all. It's rather inconsiderate.

And uh Script, it doesn't sadden you at all that you've gotten to the point where you automatically distrust? That sure as hell would upset me. :/

Oh, and I went with Riobe because he seems to be a more apt (lol) example. He got really good, really really fast.

Really fast.
and no, it is for numa. Script, you don't like being tricked? Who the hell cares if you were? Join the club! It seems like you're more worried about your ego here, but you're a pretty cool guy so I might be misunderstanding you.

It is not okay to just accuse any new user you like because you think they might be a multiaccounter. If you think that someone is a multiaccounter, keep it quiet. It seems like this community is so self-centered and not very receptive to new users anymore. Fucking shit. I'm damn well glad I joined back when this shit wasn't going on.

hmm

i think justifying deception is hard for me to agree with.

wild accusations?

we have the right to say such things. completely justified, especially since the fireburnsfree/miststalker06 incidents. really, you're taking a small issue and inflating it.

furthermore, this is for the forums, not numa.

also,

float this shit. The people need to read this.

Well, a specific few people.
i don't like it when people think they've tricked me. i can't imagine anyone who would. so when i see someone who i think is obviously not a new user, i call them out on it.

also

"future PALEMOON's" might be an even better example :3

Hell yes.

Totally agreed.